Edward Snowden didn’t just expose the possibility that state surveillance may have intruded into the lives of British citizens. He actually accused U.K. authorities of operating a system where ”anything goes,” and new details revealed this week confirm his suspicion.
The U.K. government is one of the main culprits for privacy infringement. Mass indiscriminate surveillance programmes include monitoring of emails, calls, internet searches, contact lists, and the gathering of vast amounts of other data that is not essential.
Just over a week ago, Amnesty International issued a press release on a ruling by the U.K. surveillance tribunal. The ruling asserted that the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) acted unlawfully by conducting surveillance on two human rights organisations. GCHQ is the government’s security and intelligence organisation tasked with protecting the nation from threats.
The tribunal, which was brought against the U.K. government by ten NGOs and included Amnesty International, found the government in breach of its internal surveillance policies. It violated its own policies by accessing and retaining the communications of two NGOs, one in Egypt and one in South Africa.
At the time, Amnesty International’s Legal Programme Director, Rachel Logan, said,
“Today’s decision revealing GCHQ’s unlawful activity raises the wider question as to why the UK intelligence services were intercepting the communications of these two highly regarded human rights NGOs at all. It is hard to imagine how they could legitimately be the target of criminal suspicion. Were they simply victims of mass surveillance – being swept up in indiscriminate trawling? And if so, do we only know about it because the spies failed to follow even their own weak procedures? Were the rest of us rounded up in the same net?”